Logo Umeet2001

ESPAÑOL
Presentación

Programa

Desarrollo

ENGLISH

Presentation

Programa

Desarrollo


Start of #linux buffer: Fri Dec 07 00:06:46 2001
fernand0well
fernand0let mi cover this gap
fernand0saying some words about our speaker
fernand0:)
* Borja blushes
fernand0who loves these things called er ... something BSD
fernand0and also other high end topics in computer science
fernand0he words for an importan ISP in Spain
fernand0and we are very grateful about this talk
fernand0because, even he always has time for UniNet,
fernand0he is a really busy, busy man
fernand0Of course
fernand0we also would like to give thanks to all of you
fernand0for comming here
fernand0and we apologize for this small delay
fernand0in a few moments, the talk will start
BorjaWell, this talk will be in the standard language of science,
Borja_The worm strikes back
Borjathat is, Bad English.
BorjaSorry, go on :-)
Borja_Abstract
Borja_On November 2, 1988 a worm was released into the Internet
Borja_network. The worm, which spread among Sun and VAX computers
Borja_running Unix, caused a major disruption to the net. The
Borja_Unix systems.
Borja_After the incident, many important lessons were learned.
Borja_However, most of these lessons are overlooked by software
Borja_designers who write software with the same type of problems
Borja_exploited by the worm and, worse, offers stupid functionalities
Borja_that severely compromise security.
Borja_Nowadays Internet is no longer an academic network, and while
Borja_it is becoming a service as important as the telephone network,
Borja_the security of the network seen as the set of computers
Borja_connected to it is in a much worse situation: most of the
Borja_computers run the same operating system, and the system
Borja_diversity has decreased.
Borja_To make things even worse, cheap broadband access is becoming
Borja_available for households in most developed countries, making
Borja_home computers available to launch large scale attacks.
Borja_What is happening today?
Borja_News stories about computer breakins are becoming commonplace.
Borja_Connecting a computer to the network is indeed risky. An
Borja_intruder can be anywhere. Attacking a computer round the
Borja_corner is as difficult and cheap as attacking a computer
Borja_in the antipodes. Hence, the number of potencial attackers
Borja_is very high.
Borja_Recent incidents just shown the potential of a large-scale
Borja_automated attack. Worms such as the Code Red saga or Nimda
Borja_disabled hundreds of thousands of computers worldwide.  Compromised
Borja_computers had to be desconnected from the network, although
Borja_some of them are still active looking for new victims.
Borja_These incidents not only affected directly vulnerable computers
Borja_running Microsoft operating systems; many sites with low
Borja_bandwidth links or low capacity servers and firewalls were
Borja_overloaded by the high number of compromised computers scanning
Borja_the networks for new vulnerable computers. A large number
Borja_of small sites suffered a severe denial of service during
Borja_the peak hours of propagation, and even big sites suffered
Borja_some performance problems in network equipment, being firewalls
Borja_the most vulnerable. Logfiles in webservers algo grew much
Borja_larger than usual, leading to storage problems.
Borja_The latest incidents have been the culmination of a worrying
Borja_trend we saw with Melissa, the first worm released after
Borja_the November 1988 one was "ILOVEYOU".
Borja_It exploited the presence of a programming language in the
Borja_Microsoft Office suite applications, and propagated with
Borja_infected Microsoft Word documents. When a user opened a
Borja_document, the macros present in the document used the Outlook
Borja_API to send copies of itself to contacts listed in the user's
Borja_addressbook.
Borja_The damage done by this simple worm was huge. Many organizations
Borja_had their mailservers completely overloaded, with the email
Borja_service stopped until they cleaned the servers.
Borja_This incident was possible because of two main factors:
Borja_First, thanks to the monopolistic tactics applied by Microsoft,
Borja_most home and office computers use the same application
Borja_software and operating system. In this case, Microsoft Office
Borja_and the different versions of Microsoft Windows. Hence the
Borja_number of potentially vulnerable computers was very high.
Borja_Vulnerable computers were used by people with little or
Borja_no knowledge on computer security.
Borja_Second, Microsoft software designers had been ignoring the
Borja_most elementary security measures in their developments.
Borja_There is a worrying trend in software development. New versions
Borja_offer no real innovations, and software manufacturers tend
Borja_to overload programs with stupid and useless functionality
Borja_just to add "value".
Borja_These so-called innovations are always added without paying
Borja_attention to security. Adding complexity to a program, even
Borja_paying the due attention to security, increases the risk
Borja_of introducing a security flaw. But many of the features
Borja_recently added to mainstream systems and application software
Borja_have serious design flaws.
Borja_For example, adding a full-fledged programming language to
Borja_a word processor does not seem very useful, but it is a
Borja_great tool for spreading worms. People routinely exchange
Borja_text documents. "Intelligent"
Borja_behavior pervades the Window operating system, too. Just
Borja_remember the recent "Nimda"
Borja_worm, spreading thanks to a flaw in the handling of some
Borja_MIME attachments. The routine responsible for opening a
Borja_file in Internet Explorer tries to determine the type of
Borja_file by looking at its contents, ignoring the MIME type
Borja_associated to it. It can seem useful, as it can hide user
Borja_and/or programmer mistakes, but in this case an executable
Borja_sent with an audio MIME type circumvented all the pseudo-security
Borja_checks implemented in Outlook. This was also a serious violation
Borja_of a fundamental practice in programming: correct modularization.
Borja_The situations seems to go from bad to worse. One of the
Borja_conclusions drawn from the 1988 worm was that diversity
Borja_is good, and can be essential for the surviblity of the
Borja_communications infrastructure. This is the same issue identified
Borja_recently in the debate about animal clonation. A population
Borja_of cloned sheeps could die should they be genetically vulnerable
Borja_to a particular strain of a germ. If we infect two specimens
Borja_in good health with the same germ, one of them can die while
Borja_the other survives. It is a matter of genetic vulnerability.
Borja_Exactly the same happens with operating systems. If we consider
Borja_(hypotetically, of course) all operating systems equally
Borja_secure -hence equally insecure-, it would be possible to
Borja_develop an automated attack program, perhaps a worm, capable
Borja_of affecting most of the system installations. What will
Borja_happen if every users run *the same* operating system? Then
Borja_the communications infrastructure will be in a high risk.
Borja_A single worm could make the whole network collapse.
Borja_The situation is even scarier; there is a trend towards uniformity,
Borja_as newcomers to the network are using an intrinsecally insecure
Borja_operating system: Windows. A critical mass of vulnerable
Borja_systems is being created, and these vulnerable computers
Borja_will be connected to the networks through broadband links.
Borja_These computers will be connected 24/7, probably housing
Borja_personal webservers, etc.
Borja_A similar trend is being observed in the Unix world, although
Borja_it is not so dangerous. Many people considering Unix systems
Borja_for their servers are choosing Linux just because it is
Borja_what they read in the media. This is an error. Obviously
Borja_Unix systems are not intrinsecally insecure, although programming
Borja_mistakes have been the cause of security problems in the
Borja_past, and will also cause security problems in the future.
Borja_Which future can we expect? Is Internet about to be shut
Borja_down by vandals? Is there any hope? Well, I think there
Borja_is a real risk here. Many people will connect to the network
Borja_in the coming years. The newcomers will not be trained on
Borja_computer security at all, and it seems that they will use
Borja_Windows systems.
Borja_The worms and viruses we have seen so far are not very sophisticated.
Borja_Most of them are programs designed only to replicate, causing
Borja_only collateral damage (significant, unfortunately). Nothing
Borja_has been done to steal codes, credit-card numbers, etc.
Borja_Worms have been extremely noisy. The propagation of the
Borja_worms has caused denial of service problems in many networks,
Borja_and the worms have been really noticed. However, the scenario
Borja_of a silent worm propagating at a slow pace during months
Borja_is not unlikely, and the results would be devastating.
Borja_We can do something to prevent this. First of all, we must
Borja_avoid uniformity. When planning a network design, always
Borja_avoid adopting the same operating system for everything.
Borja_Use a mix of them. No operating system is equal to the others;
Borja_even Unix systems have noticeable differences among them.
Borja_For each task, use the system best suited for it.
Borja_Another problem is the current software monopoly situation;
Borja_it must be fighted at all costs. It has almost killed innovation
Borja_in the industry, as no company can try to introduce a new
Borja_operating system. Microsoft has exclusive agreements with
Borja_every PC computer manufacturers. the situation is serious
Borja_indeed: people buying computers "withut
Borja_an operating system" (this means without
Borja_a Microsoft operating system, but this is one of the effects
Borja_of monopolies) are treated as suspicious of software piracy.
Borja_And the main battlefield here is education. We must make
Borja_sure that students learn the fundamental principles. Nowadays,
Borja_fashion dictates that computer science students must learn
Borja_to use mainstream systems. Most of them are not proficient
Borja_in proper data structures and algorithms design. Most of
Borja_them don't know about operating systems design. Without
Borja_foundation, it is impossible to have a good knowledge, and
Borja_a professional with no solid knowledge is a bad professional.
Borja_Bad professionals will only ensure that the present problems
Borja_will be worse in the future.
Borja_THE END
fernand0plasplaspl plasplasplasplas
Kefarplas plas plas plas plas
Dr_Qclap clap clap clap
Dr_Qclap clap clap clap
niyulbravo!!!!!
Dr_Qvery interesting indeep
Kefarplas plas plas plas plas
Kefarplas plas plas plas plas
> clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap
fernand0plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas
> clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap
> clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap
> clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap
> clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap
> clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap
Kefarplas plas plas plas plas
kiwnixplas plas plas
Kefarplas plas plas plas plas
> clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap
> clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap
dardhal"Education is key" <<-- that is the important thing. Great.
kiwnixclap clap clap
> a moment , Borja is traslating in #redes to spanish
> and hi have a delay....
> a moment
> very good Borja !!!
> clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap
> clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap
> clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap
> clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap
limitations)
fernand0plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas
fernand0plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas
fernand0plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas
fernand0plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas
Orozplas ...
Oroz:)
fernand0eso pareció mas una bofetada
> <sarnold> borja_ thank you; some thoughts .. when most
programs designed to perform a function, ftpd, smtpd, etc, the clear majority
fall prey to the same problems .. how can diversity truly help?
BorjaSorry... I was answering in #qc :-)
> <Borja> Hi
> <hensema_> Borja: what's your opinion on the recently
released Evolution email-client, which is -- at least in appearance -- similar to
Microsoft Outlook?
> <sarnold> Borja_, furthermore, true completely seperate
implementation diversity is *expensive* .. there are really only a few good mail
clients out there .. implementing more is way too much work!
BorjaWell, different implementations are not usually vulnerable to the
same flaws, or, at least, to the same exploits.
BorjaYou shouldn't bet all your money to the same horse, I think... ;-)
divachao a todos
divaque la pacen bien
BorjaNext?
Borjaregarding the appearance of Evolution, I don't think it is an
issue. Outlook is a bad program from the security point of view. I don't use it,
so I cannot comment on other issues ;-)
BorjaI am using Kmail right now and I want to try Evolution.
#linux
Dr_Qnow
Dr_Qafter this conference
Dr_Qi have clear
#linux
Dr_Qwhat are the main causes about
Dr_Qthe insecure at internet but...
Borja<leonardop> Borja... thanks for your interesting talk. Just for
curiosity, what's your favorite BSD OS? and why?
dardhalAnother "single point of failure" on today's Internet is DNS
root servers, many of them using some version of BIND, which is scary
BorjaWell, my favourite version of BSD is FreeBSD. I use PCs and it
seems to be the best optimized for PCs.
Dr_Qisnt there other solucions but education to improve security?
BorjaYes, it is a single point of failure but if it is not excuted in the
*same* operating system, at least it would be a daunting task to take over most
DNS servers. If all of them were running exactly the same, we would be at a
real risk.
BorjaEducation is critical in this case. This is related to a similar
problem affecting society in general, the lack of scientific culture.
sarnolddr_q -- a massive help would be to switch to more type-safe
languages ...
dardhalBorja: correct, but maybe you don't want more than taking the
servers down, and halt the Interet as a whole :(
Dr_Qx
Dr_Qsarnold: thank you
#linux
Bacchus[brutus.conectiva.com.br]: EOF from client)
BorjaPeople can be easily deceived by someone using some
scientific words. Take, for example, homeopathy. many people think that it is
legitimate. With some scientific culture you can see for yourself that its claims
are absurd
BorjaThere are many risks now, sarnold. Someone may want to take
the net down. Someone may want to compromise as many computers as
possible to get valuable information. It has happened...
Dr_Qthe only secure computer is the unplugged computer :-)
BorjaYes, but today an unplugged computer is just a pile of metal
and sand.
LarstiQvan Eck phreaking et al, make that the demolished computer
Borja:-)
#linux
BorjaNext?
JAZZANOVAhere it is spoken about the education, that is
fundamental without a doubt, but what we do to spread it, to foment it?
BorjaWell, university teachers must make sure that students learn
computer science, not how to use a visual programming toolkit, a frequent
mistake.
STAR[shine.cmw.sld.cu])
g/ <-- php developer? hop on in ....)
BorjaAll of us can make a difference. I am sure many of you have
friends who ask for help.
BorjaYou can educate them.
JAZZANOVAthanks
BorjaAnd I don't think type-safe languages will alone fix the problem.
BorjaI agree that C is not the best language for all the tasks for which
it is used now. But it is great for systems programming.
velcoespecially when people just keep using old-fashined C ...
from client)
BorjaBut buffer overflows are not the only kind of security flaws.
There is a more dangerous kind, derived from interactions between programs.
fernand0well there is an aforism i read somewhere
fernand0choose any language
fernand0and you can find a 'hacker' doing assembler in that
language
fernand0hehe
BorjaI mean, of course wiping buffer overflows wouls make our lives
easier, but it is not a silver bullet.
BorjaYes, it is true :-)
BorjaAnd this kind of things bring us to my obsession... E D U C A T I
O N
BorjaStudents are exposed to really bad influences.
-- Accept no limitations)
BorjaThey are growing among poorly designed programs.
fernand0discipline an order are not well considered features
BorjaHow many of you have used a non-Windows or non-Unix
operating system?
Borja(And non-MSDOS, of course)?
fernand0macos ?
fernand0hehe
fernand0pre-X, of course
pdpas400
JAZZANOVAbeos :)
BorjaSorry, I mea "non-mainstream"
dardhalLinux-only for some time :)
Borja:-)
fernand0i supposed it, but wanted to joke
BorjaVSTA? Amoeba? Plan 9? Inferno?
BorjaAnyone?
leonardopnon-Unix? I mean... there's a non-Unix OS out there? :-)
BorjaErOS?
sarnold(heh, don't say that loud enough for The Open Group to hear
you.. :)
sarnoldborja -- EROS! I've not yet booted it, but I've read all the docs
:)
pdpos/360//390  for instance
fernand0vms ?
BorjaYes, but I am thinking about systems with new ideas:-)
fernand0it was mainstream hehe
BorjaVMS... the previous work of the artist who perpetrated NT...
fernand0well
BorjaVomit Making System, as Richard Stallman used to call it years
ago
fernand0i read somewhere that they are proud of it, at digital 0:)
sarnoldyeah, but RMS removed the wheel check from 'su', so ... :)
Elizsaludos a todos!
BorjaWell, VMS was stable. I just didn't like it
kiwnixHURD is a non-unix?
fernand0well, mos unices are, aren't they?
BorjaBut Windows NT is a piece of crap. id any of you read the
special issue of "IEEE Computer" covering Windows NT?
BorjaIt was similar to a PC magazine. Horrible
fernand0business are business
Dr_Qi think windows is more secure than linux
BorjaReally?
viXardBorja, what about theres an stadarized OS like happened with
C language
Dr_Qjuer, say that have caused me a stomach-ache
sarnoldDr_Q -- for kicks, sometime, head to securityfocus.com, look
for the bugtraq archives, and look for the advisories from any single linux
vendor, and any single microsoft vendor (heh heh) and do some counting... :)
Dr_QBorja: no, i was joking again
viXardwould this be a really problem ?
Borja:-)
Dr_Qi use debian for a long time ago, and from then i dont know
what a antivirus is
fernand0it is not secure, it is sure that IT professionals will get more
money securign it :)
viXardBorja, what about theres an stadarized OS like happened with
C language, would it be a disaster ?
BorjaviXard, I don't think so. I mean, standardization affects APIs and
command syntax, but there are many different CPUs out there.
Eliz[169.158.164.136])
velcosarnold: in fact, IIRC CERT has such lies, damned lies and
statistics, which show similar number of vulnerabilities in Linux and Doze
sarnoldvelco, which just goes to show that, for some set of rules,
windows isn't moer secure than linux :)
velcosure.
BorjaBut those vulnerabilities are different indeed.
vulnerabilties wide open :)
sorts of odd behaviors in Windows, like that stupid routine in IE that tries to
determine the type of a file by its contents instead of using the MIME type.
dardhalsarnold: so we come to the point Borja talked about,
education (both users' education and vendors' education)
BorjaThis sord of confusion is bad, it is serious. I don't see this in
Unix.
BorjaOf course there are minor programming mistakes, but most of
them are fixed with at most a 100 line patch.
Dr_Qive notice that my level of english have been getting lower and
lower :-(
> some data.... Borja: Message Labs estimate that que en 1999 la
relacion virus / messaje mail ratio was 1/1400 during 1999. At 2000 year, this
ratio was 1/700 and probably will be 1/300 en 2001. Also we have spam...
indeed, do you think that the email have a good future?
BorjaWhich is the size of a Windows fix? I am not talking about the
size of the service packs, but have a look at the very nature of the flaws.
BorjaDo you think they are similar?
viXardBorja, what about those people that are technitians but don´t
know anything about MIME type and networks structures. Are they helpless ?
BorjaWell, email is the most important Internet service. It is funny,
considering that its designers didn't think it would be used at all..
fernand0what about .Net ?
fernand0how will go things there ?
BorjaWell, the security of Passport has already been compromised ;-)
pdpit is also the most Mis-used service on the Internet
fernand0hehe
Borja.Net is a real risk.
BorjaEven the Gartner Group says it!
fernand0some experts said that it was not so bad
sarnoldpdp has a good point .. the fact that emails have 'attachments'
demonstrates that distributed filesystems for the most part need work
BorjaFernand0, if you believe in diversity you don't belieeve in .Net
or any similar iniciative.
fernand0that's true
viXardWhat about privacy security, is there a way to keep my privacy
from the owner of the service ?
lack of attention to security... would you trust it?
BorjaYes, viXard, strong cryptography, fortunately available for all of
us.
BorjaHave a look at the Phil Zimmerman's pages in MIT.
viXardwhat abut LSSI ?
BorjaPGP has saved lives of people under dictatorships
BorjaWell, I think the golverment knows nothing about Internet. They
have to learn...
BorjaLSSI has some good points, but unfortunately it has very
danbgerous points.
BorjaAnyway it won't pass. It is against the constitution.
viXardSpanish Constitution
BorjaYes, I forgot it :-)
viXardwhat about the rest of europe and the world ?
Borja(I'm Spanish)
for being a country with great civil freedom, despite their claims.
dardhalBorja: Spanish LSSI prerelease3 does have major changes
with respect to the original version.
viXardUS have released new laws that permits authorities to look
under our dresses ;)
BorjaI know, but have not read the 0.33 version.
#linux
viXardsolo 5 mins
dardhalBorja: it is far from perfect, but is a major advance with repect
to the original one
viXardIf Kriptopolis moved their servers to US away from LSSI, then
they must be back running away fron new US laws XD
viXardIs an endless running
dardhalviXard: jeje, what kriptopolis did is something still not
explained
viXardjej
viXardthey are going to end on south pole
dardhalviXard: a good place to overclock Athlons :)
viXardor inside a submarine called Nautilus
viXardyeah !
viXardthey can make a conection to chile XD
BorjaMars? :-)
BorjaOr perhaps with a wireless link to a backpack!
Borja:-)
viXardjeje
sarnoldborja -- one still needs to find an uplink, which can be tough..
viXardyeah, The moon is american
dardhalviXard: the submarine could be attacked by a huge and
horrid slow-moving species called Mozilla XDD
viXarddamn right
BorjaAnyway, I don't think it will be so hard.
SKARLET[169.158.164.157])
viXardwhat about self-implanted worms?
pdpjust eat a Burger....
viXardadministrators that are unconfortable with their companies and
write their own worms
sarnoldheh, protecting against upset administrators can be pretty
tough :)
BorjaIt is just the same old problem with internal security.
BorjaAlmost impossible, depending on the resources available ;-)
Orozkeep the administrator comfortable...
viXardje
viXardno way to do it XD
CTCP TROUT THIS, BITCH!)
sarnoldsure .. have the OS and applications require N identical
actions from N different administrators before any changes can be made
BorjaAnyone with responsibility can cause a lot of damage. What
about excutives?
BorjaYes, but it is expensive. You need complex systems to do that.
BorjaThat's why I say "depending on available resources" :-)
sarnoldayup :)
sarnoldit was important enough that nuclear command and control
systems were designed that way ..
dardhalBorja: "common sense" seems to be a scarce resource,
specially at many Spanish companies :(
sarnoldbut you will note that WinNT/XP was *not* designed that way,
and .. to the best of my knowledge, no Unix systems either :)
sarnolddardhal: s/Spanish//
dardhalsarnold: but here the situation seems even worse, we are
some years behind in everything
BorjaNo, but Unix has a simpler dsign, and it is a plus.
dardhalsarnold: including "common sense"
BorjaI don't think so, dardhal
BorjaTrue, there are fewer Internet users than in USA. And so?
dardhalBorja: not talking about users, but about "corporate
computing"
BorjaProblems are similar in USA and in Spain in corporations
Dr_Qdardhal its worse in other country like Cuba, where access to
internet is censured
dardhalDr_Q: sure, but we are talking about places were "freedom"
is not a primary concern, because you "have it"
Dr_Qi agree
BorjaAnyway, we should not get it for granted. Now and then
someone will try to limit our freedom.
BorjaLook at what is happening now.
viXardyeah
viXardkill the bastards XD
sarnoldheh, you don't have to put up with .us's ashcroft :)
BorjaWe have our own ashcrofts here...
sarnoldoh; I'm sorry to hear that :(
dardhalBorja: but many people think lack of freedom is when you are
put into jail, not before. There is no "critical mass" of people concerned about,
for example, what is going on in the USA
sarnoldI figured the EU countries were generally more sane...
Dr_Qwell, good night to everybody
Borjadardhal, I think many people here are concerned indeed
dardhalsarnold: Europe is like The Matrix, nobady can tell what it is :(
Dr_Qi promise to pratice my english to improve it :-)
BorjaYes, sarnold, but there are crazy politicians all over the world
viXarddarhal: jeje
dardhalBorja: one think is to be concerned about facts, and the other
about what some political parties and social groups want you to believe
BorjaWell, what is your opinion on my Bad English? ;-)
dardhalBorja: not bas, excelent english
dardhals/bas/bad/
viXardhow many people in here don´t speal spanish ?
Dr_Qyour english is very bueno
Dr_Q:-)
BorjaOf course, we are lucky. This conversation is actually taking
place!
viXardmy vocabulary is going down XD
Dr_Qand mine
Borja:-)
sarnoldviXard -- 'hola', 'como te lama', 'bueno', are about all my
spanish :)
Dr_Qsome time ago, i used to practice english every day
viXardi don´t know how to say "glutamato de potasio "
Dr_Qsarnold: using that words you can build a lot of phrases
dardhalDr_Q: I'm sure you read much more english pages a day
than in spanish
sarnolddonde esta el banos .. :)
Dr_Qdardhal: yes
sarnold(I can't find the n~ key on my keyboard :)
Dr_Qbut its different understands what you read that try to write in
english what a have in my mind
Orozsarnold: una cerveza por favor?
sarnoldgroz, jejej :)
Dr_Qbye
Dr_Q;-)
Orozusually everbody knows the meaning of that
viXardgoing back to tiranosaurious species......
sarnold'night Dr_Q
viXardwhat about that meeting about cybercrimen just few days ago ?
viXardwhat´s was the real declaration of that ?
BorjaWell, I think cybercrime must be fught
Borja(fought)
dardhalviXard: it was signed, approved by some countries, and
about to generate country-wide laws to enforce it
BorjaI mean, we need freedom. But nobody needs freedom to
damage others.
viXardbut they "way " they apply those laws, is what matters me
viXardi´m more paranoic about authorities than about crackers
BorjaI am paranoid about both
viXardor a damn stupid script kiddie
dardhalviXard: this treaty about cybercrime says little about
punishment, but talks a great deal about "ISP collaborating with authorities to
gather data an evidences"
BorjaBut crackers, even the lamest of the script kiddies, are limiting
our trust on communication networks.
Oroz'nigh *
But then again, who does?)
viXardI was readind few weeks ago, "the hacker crackdown", and
there was a lot of abuses against people
BorjaI agree with you, and we need well-thought laws.
BorjaBut, as there is a law that protects you from being stolen, raped
or killed, there should be one protecting your email
viXardFBI and USSS were a real pain in the ass, for every BBS owner
BorjaI know. It was very bad done, indeed. They knew nothing
(Aplicación Saliendo)
viXardbut they don´t acuse you for rober at least they have proves
JAZZANOVAanyone knows about "Linterna Mágica" ? i dont know
the real name...
viXardinstead of cybercrime, they asume that as you know computer
stuff, you´re dangerous
BorjaIt is a cultural problem. They must learn.
sarnold'Magic Lantern'
BorjaIf I say I am a supporter of nuclear energy, how many of you will
see an alarm flashing?
sarnoldborja, I've got mixed feelings, for sure ..
dardhalBorja: nuclear energy is good, is taken seriously
BorjaThere are lots of irrational feelings about many subjects. This is
happening with cybercrime among judges, politicians and lawyers, and the
society in general.
#linux
viXardpeoples rights are are subvaluated
dardhalviXard: people are not aware of their rights, and so they don't
fight for them
viXardmy mailbox was digged out whithout my knowlegde, and
without no authority permission
viXardjust because a suspicious
viXardwhere did I should go?
viXardnowhere! nobody´s deffending my rights against that
BorjaThat should be punished, of course.
sarnoldviXard -- run your own ISP :)
BorjaAnyway, no court would accept it as a proof
viXardlaws don´t consider this as a right
viXardsarnold, that was at my last job
viXardpeople
viXardhttp://www.walc2002.pucmm.edu.do/
viXardEl V taller en teconologias de redes e internet para america
latina y el caribe
krUNIXviZard?
viXardMay 2002
viXardKrUNIX ?
krUNIXlinuxlatino?
viXardsep
krUNIXcool
krUNIXviniste a la conferencia?
dardhalIt's been a great pleasure to talk with all of you
viXardPARTICIPANTES EXTRANJEROS
viXard1.- US$1,300.00 PARA LOS QUE SE INSCRIBAN ANTES DEL 15 DE FEBRERO 2002.
viXardIncluye participación en el taller seleccionado, alojamiento, desayunos, almuerzos, Refrigerios, Transporte desde el hotel al lugar del evento, Seguro de Hospitalización y Cirugia en caso de accidentes.
viXard2.- US$1,400.00 PARA LOS QUE SE INSCRIBAN DESPUES DEL 15 DE FEBRERO 2002.
viXardIncluye participacion en el taller seleccionado, Alojamiento, Desayunos, Almuerzos, Refrigerios, Transporte desde el hotel al lugar del evento, Seguro de Hospitalización y Cirugia en caso de Accidentes.
dardhalGodd morning/evening/night || Buenos días/tardes/noches
viXardsame, darhal XD
sarnolddardhal :)
viXardkrUNIX: sip, estaba charlando un poco con el conferencistas y otras personas
krUNIXaja
krUNIXpero ya termino la confrencia?
viXardsep
krUNIX:(
krUNIXllegue tarde
krUNIXlos logs los publicaran?
viXardhttp://umeet.uninet.edu/umeet2001/spanish/prog.html
BorjaEstarán en el web mañana, supongo
viXardhttp://umeet.uninet.edu/umeet2001/spanish/des.html <-- los logs
krUNIXcool
krUNIX;)
krUNIXgrax
krUNIXaja
viXardme cambio de conexion
wings)
krUNIXentonces mañana es ataques de DoS
End of #linux buffer Fri Dec 07 00:06:46 2001

Generated by irclog2html.pl by Jeff Waugh - find it at freshmeat.net!


Mas información: umeet@uninet.edu