| Start of #linux buffer: Fri Dec 07 00:06:46 2001 |
| fernand0 | well |
| fernand0 | let mi cover this gap |
| fernand0 | saying some words about our speaker |
| fernand0 | :) |
| * Borja blushes |
| fernand0 | who loves these things called er ... something BSD |
| fernand0 | and also other high end topics in computer science |
| fernand0 | he words for an importan ISP in Spain |
| fernand0 | and we are very grateful about this talk |
| fernand0 | because, even he always has time for UniNet, |
| fernand0 | he is a really busy, busy man |
| fernand0 | Of course |
| fernand0 | we also would like to give thanks to all of you |
| fernand0 | for comming here |
| fernand0 | and we apologize for this small delay |
| fernand0 | in a few moments, the talk will start |
| Borja | Well, this talk will be in the standard language of science, |
| Borja_ | The worm strikes back |
| Borja | that is, Bad English. |
| Borja | Sorry, go on :-) |
| Borja_ | Abstract |
| Borja_ | On November 2, 1988 a worm was released into the Internet |
| Borja_ | network. The worm, which spread among Sun and VAX computers |
| Borja_ | running Unix, caused a major disruption to the net. The |
| Borja_ | Unix systems. |
| Borja_ | After the incident, many important lessons were learned. |
| Borja_ | However, most of these lessons are overlooked by software |
| Borja_ | designers who write software with the same type of problems |
| Borja_ | exploited by the worm and, worse, offers stupid functionalities |
| Borja_ | that severely compromise security. |
| Borja_ | Nowadays Internet is no longer an academic network, and while |
| Borja_ | it is becoming a service as important as the telephone network, |
| Borja_ | the security of the network seen as the set of computers |
| Borja_ | connected to it is in a much worse situation: most of the |
| Borja_ | computers run the same operating system, and the system |
| Borja_ | diversity has decreased. |
| Borja_ | To make things even worse, cheap broadband access is becoming |
| Borja_ | available for households in most developed countries, making |
| Borja_ | home computers available to launch large scale attacks. |
| Borja_ | What is happening today? |
| Borja_ | News stories about computer breakins are becoming commonplace. |
| Borja_ | Connecting a computer to the network is indeed risky. An |
| Borja_ | intruder can be anywhere. Attacking a computer round the |
| Borja_ | corner is as difficult and cheap as attacking a computer |
| Borja_ | in the antipodes. Hence, the number of potencial attackers |
| Borja_ | is very high. |
| Borja_ | Recent incidents just shown the potential of a large-scale |
| Borja_ | automated attack. Worms such as the Code Red saga or Nimda |
| Borja_ | disabled hundreds of thousands of computers worldwide. Compromised |
| Borja_ | computers had to be desconnected from the network, although |
| Borja_ | some of them are still active looking for new victims. |
| Borja_ | These incidents not only affected directly vulnerable computers |
| Borja_ | running Microsoft operating systems; many sites with low |
| Borja_ | bandwidth links or low capacity servers and firewalls were |
| Borja_ | overloaded by the high number of compromised computers scanning |
| Borja_ | the networks for new vulnerable computers. A large number |
| Borja_ | of small sites suffered a severe denial of service during |
| Borja_ | the peak hours of propagation, and even big sites suffered |
| Borja_ | some performance problems in network equipment, being firewalls |
| Borja_ | the most vulnerable. Logfiles in webservers algo grew much |
| Borja_ | larger than usual, leading to storage problems. |
| Borja_ | The latest incidents have been the culmination of a worrying |
| Borja_ | trend we saw with Melissa, the first worm released after |
| Borja_ | the November 1988 one was "ILOVEYOU". |
| Borja_ | It exploited the presence of a programming language in the |
| Borja_ | Microsoft Office suite applications, and propagated with |
| Borja_ | infected Microsoft Word documents. When a user opened a |
| Borja_ | document, the macros present in the document used the Outlook |
| Borja_ | API to send copies of itself to contacts listed in the user's |
| Borja_ | addressbook. |
| Borja_ | The damage done by this simple worm was huge. Many organizations |
| Borja_ | had their mailservers completely overloaded, with the email |
| Borja_ | service stopped until they cleaned the servers. |
| Borja_ | This incident was possible because of two main factors: |
| Borja_ | First, thanks to the monopolistic tactics applied by Microsoft, |
| Borja_ | most home and office computers use the same application |
| Borja_ | software and operating system. In this case, Microsoft Office |
| Borja_ | and the different versions of Microsoft Windows. Hence the |
| Borja_ | number of potentially vulnerable computers was very high. |
| Borja_ | Vulnerable computers were used by people with little or |
| Borja_ | no knowledge on computer security. |
| Borja_ | Second, Microsoft software designers had been ignoring the |
| Borja_ | most elementary security measures in their developments. |
| Borja_ | There is a worrying trend in software development. New versions |
| Borja_ | offer no real innovations, and software manufacturers tend |
| Borja_ | to overload programs with stupid and useless functionality |
| Borja_ | just to add "value". |
| Borja_ | These so-called innovations are always added without paying |
| Borja_ | attention to security. Adding complexity to a program, even |
| Borja_ | paying the due attention to security, increases the risk |
| Borja_ | of introducing a security flaw. But many of the features |
| Borja_ | recently added to mainstream systems and application software |
| Borja_ | have serious design flaws. |
| Borja_ | For example, adding a full-fledged programming language to |
| Borja_ | a word processor does not seem very useful, but it is a |
| Borja_ | great tool for spreading worms. People routinely exchange |
| Borja_ | text documents. "Intelligent" |
| Borja_ | behavior pervades the Window operating system, too. Just |
| Borja_ | remember the recent "Nimda" |
| Borja_ | worm, spreading thanks to a flaw in the handling of some |
| Borja_ | MIME attachments. The routine responsible for opening a |
| Borja_ | file in Internet Explorer tries to determine the type of |
| Borja_ | file by looking at its contents, ignoring the MIME type |
| Borja_ | associated to it. It can seem useful, as it can hide user |
| Borja_ | and/or programmer mistakes, but in this case an executable |
| Borja_ | sent with an audio MIME type circumvented all the pseudo-security |
| Borja_ | checks implemented in Outlook. This was also a serious violation |
| Borja_ | of a fundamental practice in programming: correct modularization. |
| Borja_ | The situations seems to go from bad to worse. One of the |
| Borja_ | conclusions drawn from the 1988 worm was that diversity |
| Borja_ | is good, and can be essential for the surviblity of the |
| Borja_ | communications infrastructure. This is the same issue identified |
| Borja_ | recently in the debate about animal clonation. A population |
| Borja_ | of cloned sheeps could die should they be genetically vulnerable |
| Borja_ | to a particular strain of a germ. If we infect two specimens |
| Borja_ | in good health with the same germ, one of them can die while |
| Borja_ | the other survives. It is a matter of genetic vulnerability. |
| Borja_ | Exactly the same happens with operating systems. If we consider |
| Borja_ | (hypotetically, of course) all operating systems equally |
| Borja_ | secure -hence equally insecure-, it would be possible to |
| Borja_ | develop an automated attack program, perhaps a worm, capable |
| Borja_ | of affecting most of the system installations. What will |
| Borja_ | happen if every users run *the same* operating system? Then |
| Borja_ | the communications infrastructure will be in a high risk. |
| Borja_ | A single worm could make the whole network collapse. |
| Borja_ | The situation is even scarier; there is a trend towards uniformity, |
| Borja_ | as newcomers to the network are using an intrinsecally insecure |
| Borja_ | operating system: Windows. A critical mass of vulnerable |
| Borja_ | systems is being created, and these vulnerable computers |
| Borja_ | will be connected to the networks through broadband links. |
| Borja_ | These computers will be connected 24/7, probably housing |
| Borja_ | personal webservers, etc. |
| Borja_ | A similar trend is being observed in the Unix world, although |
| Borja_ | it is not so dangerous. Many people considering Unix systems |
| Borja_ | for their servers are choosing Linux just because it is |
| Borja_ | what they read in the media. This is an error. Obviously |
| Borja_ | Unix systems are not intrinsecally insecure, although programming |
| Borja_ | mistakes have been the cause of security problems in the |
| Borja_ | past, and will also cause security problems in the future. |
| Borja_ | Which future can we expect? Is Internet about to be shut |
| Borja_ | down by vandals? Is there any hope? Well, I think there |
| Borja_ | is a real risk here. Many people will connect to the network |
| Borja_ | in the coming years. The newcomers will not be trained on |
| Borja_ | computer security at all, and it seems that they will use |
| Borja_ | Windows systems. |
| Borja_ | The worms and viruses we have seen so far are not very sophisticated. |
| Borja_ | Most of them are programs designed only to replicate, causing |
| Borja_ | only collateral damage (significant, unfortunately). Nothing |
| Borja_ | has been done to steal codes, credit-card numbers, etc. |
| Borja_ | Worms have been extremely noisy. The propagation of the |
| Borja_ | worms has caused denial of service problems in many networks, |
| Borja_ | and the worms have been really noticed. However, the scenario |
| Borja_ | of a silent worm propagating at a slow pace during months |
| Borja_ | is not unlikely, and the results would be devastating. |
| Borja_ | We can do something to prevent this. First of all, we must |
| Borja_ | avoid uniformity. When planning a network design, always |
| Borja_ | avoid adopting the same operating system for everything. |
| Borja_ | Use a mix of them. No operating system is equal to the others; |
| Borja_ | even Unix systems have noticeable differences among them. |
| Borja_ | For each task, use the system best suited for it. |
| Borja_ | Another problem is the current software monopoly situation; |
| Borja_ | it must be fighted at all costs. It has almost killed innovation |
| Borja_ | in the industry, as no company can try to introduce a new |
| Borja_ | operating system. Microsoft has exclusive agreements with |
| Borja_ | every PC computer manufacturers. the situation is serious |
| Borja_ | indeed: people buying computers "withut |
| Borja_ | an operating system" (this means without |
| Borja_ | a Microsoft operating system, but this is one of the effects |
| Borja_ | of monopolies) are treated as suspicious of software piracy. |
| Borja_ | And the main battlefield here is education. We must make |
| Borja_ | sure that students learn the fundamental principles. Nowadays, |
| Borja_ | fashion dictates that computer science students must learn |
| Borja_ | to use mainstream systems. Most of them are not proficient |
| Borja_ | in proper data structures and algorithms design. Most of |
| Borja_ | them don't know about operating systems design. Without |
| Borja_ | foundation, it is impossible to have a good knowledge, and |
| Borja_ | a professional with no solid knowledge is a bad professional. |
| Borja_ | Bad professionals will only ensure that the present problems |
| Borja_ | will be worse in the future. |
| Borja_ | THE END |
| fernand0 | plasplaspl plasplasplasplas |
| Kefar | plas plas plas plas plas |
| Dr_Q | clap clap clap clap |
| Dr_Q | clap clap clap clap |
| niyul | bravo!!!!! |
| Dr_Q | very interesting indeep |
| Kefar | plas plas plas plas plas |
| Kefar | plas plas plas plas plas |
| > clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap |
| fernand0 | plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas |
| > clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap |
| > clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap |
| > clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap |
| > clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap |
| > clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap |
| Kefar | plas plas plas plas plas |
| kiwnix | plas plas plas |
| Kefar | plas plas plas plas plas |
| > clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap |
| > clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap |
| dardhal | "Education is key" <<-- that is the important thing. Great. |
| kiwnix | clap clap clap |
| > a moment , Borja is traslating in #redes to spanish |
| > and hi have a delay.... |
| > a moment |
| > very good Borja !!! |
| > clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap |
| > clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap |
| > clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap |
| > clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap |
| limitations) |
| fernand0 | plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas |
| fernand0 | plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas |
| fernand0 | plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas |
| fernand0 | plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas |
| Oroz | plas ... |
| Oroz | :) |
| fernand0 | eso pareció mas una bofetada |
| > <sarnold> borja_ thank you; some thoughts .. when most |
| programs designed to perform a function, ftpd, smtpd, etc, the clear majority |
| fall prey to the same problems .. how can diversity truly help? |
| Borja | Sorry... I was answering in #qc :-) |
| > <Borja> Hi |
| > <hensema_> Borja: what's your opinion on the recently |
| released Evolution email-client, which is -- at least in appearance -- similar to |
| Microsoft Outlook? |
| > <sarnold> Borja_, furthermore, true completely seperate |
| implementation diversity is *expensive* .. there are really only a few good mail |
| clients out there .. implementing more is way too much work! |
| Borja | Well, different implementations are not usually vulnerable to the |
| same flaws, or, at least, to the same exploits. |
| Borja | You shouldn't bet all your money to the same horse, I think... ;-) |
| diva | chao a todos |
| diva | que la pacen bien |
| Borja | Next? |
| Borja | regarding the appearance of Evolution, I don't think it is an |
| issue. Outlook is a bad program from the security point of view. I don't use it, |
| so I cannot comment on other issues ;-) |
| Borja | I am using Kmail right now and I want to try Evolution. |
| #linux |
| Dr_Q | now |
| Dr_Q | after this conference |
| Dr_Q | i have clear |
| #linux |
| Dr_Q | what are the main causes about |
| Dr_Q | the insecure at internet but... |
| Borja | <leonardop> Borja... thanks for your interesting talk. Just for |
| curiosity, what's your favorite BSD OS? and why? |
| dardhal | Another "single point of failure" on today's Internet is DNS |
| root servers, many of them using some version of BIND, which is scary |
| Borja | Well, my favourite version of BSD is FreeBSD. I use PCs and it |
| seems to be the best optimized for PCs. |
| Dr_Q | isnt there other solucions but education to improve security? |
| Borja | Yes, it is a single point of failure but if it is not excuted in the |
| *same* operating system, at least it would be a daunting task to take over most |
| DNS servers. If all of them were running exactly the same, we would be at a |
| real risk. |
| Borja | Education is critical in this case. This is related to a similar |
| problem affecting society in general, the lack of scientific culture. |
| sarnold | dr_q -- a massive help would be to switch to more type-safe |
| languages ... |
| dardhal | Borja: correct, but maybe you don't want more than taking the |
| servers down, and halt the Interet as a whole :( |
| Dr_Q | x |
| Dr_Q | sarnold: thank you |
| #linux |
| Bacchus[brutus.conectiva.com.br]: EOF from client) |
| Borja | People can be easily deceived by someone using some |
| scientific words. Take, for example, homeopathy. many people think that it is |
| legitimate. With some scientific culture you can see for yourself that its claims |
| are absurd |
| Borja | There are many risks now, sarnold. Someone may want to take |
| the net down. Someone may want to compromise as many computers as |
| possible to get valuable information. It has happened... |
| Dr_Q | the only secure computer is the unplugged computer :-) |
| Borja | Yes, but today an unplugged computer is just a pile of metal |
| and sand. |
| LarstiQ | van Eck phreaking et al, make that the demolished computer |
| Borja | :-) |
| #linux |
| Borja | Next? |
| JAZZANOVA | here it is spoken about the education, that is |
| fundamental without a doubt, but what we do to spread it, to foment it? |
| Borja | Well, university teachers must make sure that students learn |
| computer science, not how to use a visual programming toolkit, a frequent |
| mistake. |
| STAR[shine.cmw.sld.cu]) |
| g/ <-- php developer? hop on in ....) |
| Borja | All of us can make a difference. I am sure many of you have |
| friends who ask for help. |
| Borja | You can educate them. |
| JAZZANOVA | thanks |
| Borja | And I don't think type-safe languages will alone fix the problem. |
| Borja | I agree that C is not the best language for all the tasks for which |
| it is used now. But it is great for systems programming. |
| velco | especially when people just keep using old-fashined C ... |
| from client) |
| Borja | But buffer overflows are not the only kind of security flaws. |
| There is a more dangerous kind, derived from interactions between programs. |
| fernand0 | well there is an aforism i read somewhere |
| fernand0 | choose any language |
| fernand0 | and you can find a 'hacker' doing assembler in that |
| language |
| fernand0 | hehe |
| Borja | I mean, of course wiping buffer overflows wouls make our lives |
| easier, but it is not a silver bullet. |
| Borja | Yes, it is true :-) |
| Borja | And this kind of things bring us to my obsession... E D U C A T I |
| O N |
| Borja | Students are exposed to really bad influences. |
| -- Accept no limitations) |
| Borja | They are growing among poorly designed programs. |
| fernand0 | discipline an order are not well considered features |
| Borja | How many of you have used a non-Windows or non-Unix |
| operating system? |
| Borja | (And non-MSDOS, of course)? |
| fernand0 | macos ? |
| fernand0 | hehe |
| fernand0 | pre-X, of course |
| pdp | as400 |
| JAZZANOVA | beos :) |
| Borja | Sorry, I mea "non-mainstream" |
| dardhal | Linux-only for some time :) |
| Borja | :-) |
| fernand0 | i supposed it, but wanted to joke |
| Borja | VSTA? Amoeba? Plan 9? Inferno? |
| Borja | Anyone? |
| leonardop | non-Unix? I mean... there's a non-Unix OS out there? :-) |
| Borja | ErOS? |
| sarnold | (heh, don't say that loud enough for The Open Group to hear |
| you.. :) |
| sarnold | borja -- EROS! I've not yet booted it, but I've read all the docs |
| :) |
| pdp | os/360//390 for instance |
| fernand0 | vms ? |
| Borja | Yes, but I am thinking about systems with new ideas:-) |
| fernand0 | it was mainstream hehe |
| Borja | VMS... the previous work of the artist who perpetrated NT... |
| fernand0 | well |
| Borja | Vomit Making System, as Richard Stallman used to call it years |
| ago |
| fernand0 | i read somewhere that they are proud of it, at digital 0:) |
| sarnold | yeah, but RMS removed the wheel check from 'su', so ... :) |
| Eliz | saludos a todos! |
| Borja | Well, VMS was stable. I just didn't like it |
| kiwnix | HURD is a non-unix? |
| fernand0 | well, mos unices are, aren't they? |
| Borja | But Windows NT is a piece of crap. id any of you read the |
| special issue of "IEEE Computer" covering Windows NT? |
| Borja | It was similar to a PC magazine. Horrible |
| fernand0 | business are business |
| Dr_Q | i think windows is more secure than linux |
| Borja | Really? |
| viXard | Borja, what about theres an stadarized OS like happened with |
| C language |
| Dr_Q | juer, say that have caused me a stomach-ache |
| sarnold | Dr_Q -- for kicks, sometime, head to securityfocus.com, look |
| for the bugtraq archives, and look for the advisories from any single linux |
| vendor, and any single microsoft vendor (heh heh) and do some counting... :) |
| Dr_Q | Borja: no, i was joking again |
| viXard | would this be a really problem ? |
| Borja | :-) |
| Dr_Q | i use debian for a long time ago, and from then i dont know |
| what a antivirus is |
| fernand0 | it is not secure, it is sure that IT professionals will get more |
| money securign it :) |
| viXard | Borja, what about theres an stadarized OS like happened with |
| C language, would it be a disaster ? |
| Borja | viXard, I don't think so. I mean, standardization affects APIs and |
| command syntax, but there are many different CPUs out there. |
| Eliz[169.158.164.136]) |
| velco | sarnold: in fact, IIRC CERT has such lies, damned lies and |
| statistics, which show similar number of vulnerabilities in Linux and Doze |
| sarnold | velco, which just goes to show that, for some set of rules, |
| windows isn't moer secure than linux :) |
| velco | sure. |
| Borja | But those vulnerabilities are different indeed. |
| vulnerabilties wide open :) |
| sorts of odd behaviors in Windows, like that stupid routine in IE that tries to |
| determine the type of a file by its contents instead of using the MIME type. |
| dardhal | sarnold: so we come to the point Borja talked about, |
| education (both users' education and vendors' education) |
| Borja | This sord of confusion is bad, it is serious. I don't see this in |
| Unix. |
| Borja | Of course there are minor programming mistakes, but most of |
| them are fixed with at most a 100 line patch. |
| Dr_Q | ive notice that my level of english have been getting lower and |
| lower :-( |
| > some data.... Borja: Message Labs estimate that que en 1999 la |
| relacion virus / messaje mail ratio was 1/1400 during 1999. At 2000 year, this |
| ratio was 1/700 and probably will be 1/300 en 2001. Also we have spam... |
| indeed, do you think that the email have a good future? |
| Borja | Which is the size of a Windows fix? I am not talking about the |
| size of the service packs, but have a look at the very nature of the flaws. |
| Borja | Do you think they are similar? |
| viXard | Borja, what about those people that are technitians but don´t |
| know anything about MIME type and networks structures. Are they helpless ? |
| Borja | Well, email is the most important Internet service. It is funny, |
| considering that its designers didn't think it would be used at all.. |
| fernand0 | what about .Net ? |
| fernand0 | how will go things there ? |
| Borja | Well, the security of Passport has already been compromised ;-) |
| pdp | it is also the most Mis-used service on the Internet |
| fernand0 | hehe |
| Borja | .Net is a real risk. |
| Borja | Even the Gartner Group says it! |
| fernand0 | some experts said that it was not so bad |
| sarnold | pdp has a good point .. the fact that emails have 'attachments' |
| demonstrates that distributed filesystems for the most part need work |
| Borja | Fernand0, if you believe in diversity you don't belieeve in .Net |
| or any similar iniciative. |
| fernand0 | that's true |
| viXard | What about privacy security, is there a way to keep my privacy |
| from the owner of the service ? |
| lack of attention to security... would you trust it? |
| Borja | Yes, viXard, strong cryptography, fortunately available for all of |
| us. |
| Borja | Have a look at the Phil Zimmerman's pages in MIT. |
| viXard | what abut LSSI ? |
| Borja | PGP has saved lives of people under dictatorships |
| Borja | Well, I think the golverment knows nothing about Internet. They |
| have to learn... |
| Borja | LSSI has some good points, but unfortunately it has very |
| danbgerous points. |
| Borja | Anyway it won't pass. It is against the constitution. |
| viXard | Spanish Constitution |
| Borja | Yes, I forgot it :-) |
| viXard | what about the rest of europe and the world ? |
| Borja | (I'm Spanish) |
| for being a country with great civil freedom, despite their claims. |
| dardhal | Borja: Spanish LSSI prerelease3 does have major changes |
| with respect to the original version. |
| viXard | US have released new laws that permits authorities to look |
| under our dresses ;) |
| Borja | I know, but have not read the 0.33 version. |
| #linux |
| viXard | solo 5 mins |
| dardhal | Borja: it is far from perfect, but is a major advance with repect |
| to the original one |
| viXard | If Kriptopolis moved their servers to US away from LSSI, then |
| they must be back running away fron new US laws XD |
| viXard | Is an endless running |
| dardhal | viXard: jeje, what kriptopolis did is something still not |
| explained |
| viXard | jej |
| viXard | they are going to end on south pole |
| dardhal | viXard: a good place to overclock Athlons :) |
| viXard | or inside a submarine called Nautilus |
| viXard | yeah ! |
| viXard | they can make a conection to chile XD |
| Borja | Mars? :-) |
| Borja | Or perhaps with a wireless link to a backpack! |
| Borja | :-) |
| viXard | jeje |
| sarnold | borja -- one still needs to find an uplink, which can be tough.. |
| viXard | yeah, The moon is american |
| dardhal | viXard: the submarine could be attacked by a huge and |
| horrid slow-moving species called Mozilla XDD |
| viXard | damn right |
| Borja | Anyway, I don't think it will be so hard. |
| SKARLET[169.158.164.157]) |
| viXard | what about self-implanted worms? |
| pdp | just eat a Burger.... |
| viXard | administrators that are unconfortable with their companies and |
| write their own worms |
| sarnold | heh, protecting against upset administrators can be pretty |
| tough :) |
| Borja | It is just the same old problem with internal security. |
| Borja | Almost impossible, depending on the resources available ;-) |
| Oroz | keep the administrator comfortable... |
| viXard | je |
| viXard | no way to do it XD |
| CTCP TROUT THIS, BITCH!) |
| sarnold | sure .. have the OS and applications require N identical |
| actions from N different administrators before any changes can be made |
| Borja | Anyone with responsibility can cause a lot of damage. What |
| about excutives? |
| Borja | Yes, but it is expensive. You need complex systems to do that. |
| Borja | That's why I say "depending on available resources" :-) |
| sarnold | ayup :) |
| sarnold | it was important enough that nuclear command and control |
| systems were designed that way .. |
| dardhal | Borja: "common sense" seems to be a scarce resource, |
| specially at many Spanish companies :( |
| sarnold | but you will note that WinNT/XP was *not* designed that way, |
| and .. to the best of my knowledge, no Unix systems either :) |
| sarnold | dardhal: s/Spanish// |
| dardhal | sarnold: but here the situation seems even worse, we are |
| some years behind in everything |
| Borja | No, but Unix has a simpler dsign, and it is a plus. |
| dardhal | sarnold: including "common sense" |
| Borja | I don't think so, dardhal |
| Borja | True, there are fewer Internet users than in USA. And so? |
| dardhal | Borja: not talking about users, but about "corporate |
| computing" |
| Borja | Problems are similar in USA and in Spain in corporations |
| Dr_Q | dardhal its worse in other country like Cuba, where access to |
| internet is censured |
| dardhal | Dr_Q: sure, but we are talking about places were "freedom" |
| is not a primary concern, because you "have it" |
| Dr_Q | i agree |
| Borja | Anyway, we should not get it for granted. Now and then |
| someone will try to limit our freedom. |
| Borja | Look at what is happening now. |
| viXard | yeah |
| viXard | kill the bastards XD |
| sarnold | heh, you don't have to put up with .us's ashcroft :) |
| Borja | We have our own ashcrofts here... |
| sarnold | oh; I'm sorry to hear that :( |
| dardhal | Borja: but many people think lack of freedom is when you are |
| put into jail, not before. There is no "critical mass" of people concerned about, |
| for example, what is going on in the USA |
| sarnold | I figured the EU countries were generally more sane... |
| Dr_Q | well, good night to everybody |
| Borja | dardhal, I think many people here are concerned indeed |
| dardhal | sarnold: Europe is like The Matrix, nobady can tell what it is :( |
| Dr_Q | i promise to pratice my english to improve it :-) |
| Borja | Yes, sarnold, but there are crazy politicians all over the world |
| viXard | darhal: jeje |
| dardhal | Borja: one think is to be concerned about facts, and the other |
| about what some political parties and social groups want you to believe |
| Borja | Well, what is your opinion on my Bad English? ;-) |
| dardhal | Borja: not bas, excelent english |
| dardhal | s/bas/bad/ |
| viXard | how many people in here don´t speal spanish ? |
| Dr_Q | your english is very bueno |
| Dr_Q | :-) |
| Borja | Of course, we are lucky. This conversation is actually taking |
| place! |
| viXard | my vocabulary is going down XD |
| Dr_Q | and mine |
| Borja | :-) |
| sarnold | viXard -- 'hola', 'como te lama', 'bueno', are about all my |
| spanish :) |
| Dr_Q | some time ago, i used to practice english every day |
| viXard | i don´t know how to say "glutamato de potasio " |
| Dr_Q | sarnold: using that words you can build a lot of phrases |
| dardhal | Dr_Q: I'm sure you read much more english pages a day |
| than in spanish |
| sarnold | donde esta el banos .. :) |
| Dr_Q | dardhal: yes |
| sarnold | (I can't find the n~ key on my keyboard :) |
| Dr_Q | but its different understands what you read that try to write in |
| english what a have in my mind |
| Oroz | sarnold: una cerveza por favor? |
| sarnold | groz, jejej :) |
| Dr_Q | bye |
| Dr_Q | ;-) |
| Oroz | usually everbody knows the meaning of that |
| viXard | going back to tiranosaurious species...... |
| sarnold | 'night Dr_Q |
| viXard | what about that meeting about cybercrimen just few days ago ? |
| viXard | what´s was the real declaration of that ? |
| Borja | Well, I think cybercrime must be fught |
| Borja | (fought) |
| dardhal | viXard: it was signed, approved by some countries, and |
| about to generate country-wide laws to enforce it |
| Borja | I mean, we need freedom. But nobody needs freedom to |
| damage others. |
| viXard | but they "way " they apply those laws, is what matters me |
| viXard | i´m more paranoic about authorities than about crackers |
| Borja | I am paranoid about both |
| viXard | or a damn stupid script kiddie |
| dardhal | viXard: this treaty about cybercrime says little about |
| punishment, but talks a great deal about "ISP collaborating with authorities to |
| gather data an evidences" |
| Borja | But crackers, even the lamest of the script kiddies, are limiting |
| our trust on communication networks. |
| Oroz | 'nigh * |
| But then again, who does?) |
| viXard | I was readind few weeks ago, "the hacker crackdown", and |
| there was a lot of abuses against people |
| Borja | I agree with you, and we need well-thought laws. |
| Borja | But, as there is a law that protects you from being stolen, raped |
| or killed, there should be one protecting your email |
| viXard | FBI and USSS were a real pain in the ass, for every BBS owner |
| Borja | I know. It was very bad done, indeed. They knew nothing |
| (Aplicación Saliendo) |
| viXard | but they don´t acuse you for rober at least they have proves |
| JAZZANOVA | anyone knows about "Linterna Mágica" ? i dont know |
| the real name... |
| viXard | instead of cybercrime, they asume that as you know computer |
| stuff, you´re dangerous |
| Borja | It is a cultural problem. They must learn. |
| sarnold | 'Magic Lantern' |
| Borja | If I say I am a supporter of nuclear energy, how many of you will |
| see an alarm flashing? |
| sarnold | borja, I've got mixed feelings, for sure .. |
| dardhal | Borja: nuclear energy is good, is taken seriously |
| Borja | There are lots of irrational feelings about many subjects. This is |
| happening with cybercrime among judges, politicians and lawyers, and the |
| society in general. |
| #linux |
| viXard | peoples rights are are subvaluated |
| dardhal | viXard: people are not aware of their rights, and so they don't |
| fight for them |
| viXard | my mailbox was digged out whithout my knowlegde, and |
| without no authority permission |
| viXard | just because a suspicious |
| viXard | where did I should go? |
| viXard | nowhere! nobody´s deffending my rights against that |
| Borja | That should be punished, of course. |
| sarnold | viXard -- run your own ISP :) |
| Borja | Anyway, no court would accept it as a proof |
| viXard | laws don´t consider this as a right |
| viXard | sarnold, that was at my last job |
| viXard | people |
| viXard | http://www.walc2002.pucmm.edu.do/ |
| viXard | El V taller en teconologias de redes e internet para america |
| latina y el caribe |
| krUNIX | viZard? |
| viXard | May 2002 |
| viXard | KrUNIX ? |
| krUNIX | linuxlatino? |
| viXard | sep |
| krUNIX | cool |
| krUNIX | viniste a la conferencia? |
| dardhal | It's been a great pleasure to talk with all of you |
| viXard | PARTICIPANTES EXTRANJEROS |
| viXard | 1.- US$1,300.00 PARA LOS QUE SE INSCRIBAN ANTES DEL 15 DE FEBRERO 2002. |
| viXard | Incluye participación en el taller seleccionado, alojamiento, desayunos, almuerzos, Refrigerios, Transporte desde el hotel al lugar del evento, Seguro de Hospitalización y Cirugia en caso de accidentes. |
| viXard | 2.- US$1,400.00 PARA LOS QUE SE INSCRIBAN DESPUES DEL 15 DE FEBRERO 2002. |
| viXard | Incluye participacion en el taller seleccionado, Alojamiento, Desayunos, Almuerzos, Refrigerios, Transporte desde el hotel al lugar del evento, Seguro de Hospitalización y Cirugia en caso de Accidentes. |
| dardhal | Godd morning/evening/night || Buenos días/tardes/noches |
| viXard | same, darhal XD |
| sarnold | dardhal :) |
| viXard | krUNIX: sip, estaba charlando un poco con el conferencistas y otras personas |
| krUNIX | aja |
| krUNIX | pero ya termino la confrencia? |
| viXard | sep |
| krUNIX | :( |
| krUNIX | llegue tarde |
| krUNIX | los logs los publicaran? |
| viXard | http://umeet.uninet.edu/umeet2001/spanish/prog.html |
| Borja | Estarán en el web mañana, supongo |
| viXard | http://umeet.uninet.edu/umeet2001/spanish/des.html <-- los logs |
| krUNIX | cool |
| krUNIX | ;) |
| krUNIX | grax |
| krUNIX | aja |
| viXard | me cambio de conexion |
| wings) |
| krUNIX | entonces mañana es ataques de DoS |
| End of #linux buffer Fri Dec 07 00:06:46 2001 |