Start of #linux buffer: Fri Dec 07 00:06:46 2001 |
fernand0 | well |
fernand0 | let mi cover this gap |
fernand0 | saying some words about our speaker |
fernand0 | :) |
* Borja blushes |
fernand0 | who loves these things called er ... something BSD |
fernand0 | and also other high end topics in computer science |
fernand0 | he words for an importan ISP in Spain |
fernand0 | and we are very grateful about this talk |
fernand0 | because, even he always has time for UniNet, |
fernand0 | he is a really busy, busy man |
fernand0 | Of course |
fernand0 | we also would like to give thanks to all of you |
fernand0 | for comming here |
fernand0 | and we apologize for this small delay |
fernand0 | in a few moments, the talk will start |
Borja | Well, this talk will be in the standard language of science, |
Borja_ | The worm strikes back |
Borja | that is, Bad English. |
Borja | Sorry, go on :-) |
Borja_ | Abstract |
Borja_ | On November 2, 1988 a worm was released into the Internet |
Borja_ | network. The worm, which spread among Sun and VAX computers |
Borja_ | running Unix, caused a major disruption to the net. The |
Borja_ | Unix systems. |
Borja_ | After the incident, many important lessons were learned. |
Borja_ | However, most of these lessons are overlooked by software |
Borja_ | designers who write software with the same type of problems |
Borja_ | exploited by the worm and, worse, offers stupid functionalities |
Borja_ | that severely compromise security. |
Borja_ | Nowadays Internet is no longer an academic network, and while |
Borja_ | it is becoming a service as important as the telephone network, |
Borja_ | the security of the network seen as the set of computers |
Borja_ | connected to it is in a much worse situation: most of the |
Borja_ | computers run the same operating system, and the system |
Borja_ | diversity has decreased. |
Borja_ | To make things even worse, cheap broadband access is becoming |
Borja_ | available for households in most developed countries, making |
Borja_ | home computers available to launch large scale attacks. |
Borja_ | What is happening today? |
Borja_ | News stories about computer breakins are becoming commonplace. |
Borja_ | Connecting a computer to the network is indeed risky. An |
Borja_ | intruder can be anywhere. Attacking a computer round the |
Borja_ | corner is as difficult and cheap as attacking a computer |
Borja_ | in the antipodes. Hence, the number of potencial attackers |
Borja_ | is very high. |
Borja_ | Recent incidents just shown the potential of a large-scale |
Borja_ | automated attack. Worms such as the Code Red saga or Nimda |
Borja_ | disabled hundreds of thousands of computers worldwide. Compromised |
Borja_ | computers had to be desconnected from the network, although |
Borja_ | some of them are still active looking for new victims. |
Borja_ | These incidents not only affected directly vulnerable computers |
Borja_ | running Microsoft operating systems; many sites with low |
Borja_ | bandwidth links or low capacity servers and firewalls were |
Borja_ | overloaded by the high number of compromised computers scanning |
Borja_ | the networks for new vulnerable computers. A large number |
Borja_ | of small sites suffered a severe denial of service during |
Borja_ | the peak hours of propagation, and even big sites suffered |
Borja_ | some performance problems in network equipment, being firewalls |
Borja_ | the most vulnerable. Logfiles in webservers algo grew much |
Borja_ | larger than usual, leading to storage problems. |
Borja_ | The latest incidents have been the culmination of a worrying |
Borja_ | trend we saw with Melissa, the first worm released after |
Borja_ | the November 1988 one was "ILOVEYOU". |
Borja_ | It exploited the presence of a programming language in the |
Borja_ | Microsoft Office suite applications, and propagated with |
Borja_ | infected Microsoft Word documents. When a user opened a |
Borja_ | document, the macros present in the document used the Outlook |
Borja_ | API to send copies of itself to contacts listed in the user's |
Borja_ | addressbook. |
Borja_ | The damage done by this simple worm was huge. Many organizations |
Borja_ | had their mailservers completely overloaded, with the email |
Borja_ | service stopped until they cleaned the servers. |
Borja_ | This incident was possible because of two main factors: |
Borja_ | First, thanks to the monopolistic tactics applied by Microsoft, |
Borja_ | most home and office computers use the same application |
Borja_ | software and operating system. In this case, Microsoft Office |
Borja_ | and the different versions of Microsoft Windows. Hence the |
Borja_ | number of potentially vulnerable computers was very high. |
Borja_ | Vulnerable computers were used by people with little or |
Borja_ | no knowledge on computer security. |
Borja_ | Second, Microsoft software designers had been ignoring the |
Borja_ | most elementary security measures in their developments. |
Borja_ | There is a worrying trend in software development. New versions |
Borja_ | offer no real innovations, and software manufacturers tend |
Borja_ | to overload programs with stupid and useless functionality |
Borja_ | just to add "value". |
Borja_ | These so-called innovations are always added without paying |
Borja_ | attention to security. Adding complexity to a program, even |
Borja_ | paying the due attention to security, increases the risk |
Borja_ | of introducing a security flaw. But many of the features |
Borja_ | recently added to mainstream systems and application software |
Borja_ | have serious design flaws. |
Borja_ | For example, adding a full-fledged programming language to |
Borja_ | a word processor does not seem very useful, but it is a |
Borja_ | great tool for spreading worms. People routinely exchange |
Borja_ | text documents. "Intelligent" |
Borja_ | behavior pervades the Window operating system, too. Just |
Borja_ | remember the recent "Nimda" |
Borja_ | worm, spreading thanks to a flaw in the handling of some |
Borja_ | MIME attachments. The routine responsible for opening a |
Borja_ | file in Internet Explorer tries to determine the type of |
Borja_ | file by looking at its contents, ignoring the MIME type |
Borja_ | associated to it. It can seem useful, as it can hide user |
Borja_ | and/or programmer mistakes, but in this case an executable |
Borja_ | sent with an audio MIME type circumvented all the pseudo-security |
Borja_ | checks implemented in Outlook. This was also a serious violation |
Borja_ | of a fundamental practice in programming: correct modularization. |
Borja_ | The situations seems to go from bad to worse. One of the |
Borja_ | conclusions drawn from the 1988 worm was that diversity |
Borja_ | is good, and can be essential for the surviblity of the |
Borja_ | communications infrastructure. This is the same issue identified |
Borja_ | recently in the debate about animal clonation. A population |
Borja_ | of cloned sheeps could die should they be genetically vulnerable |
Borja_ | to a particular strain of a germ. If we infect two specimens |
Borja_ | in good health with the same germ, one of them can die while |
Borja_ | the other survives. It is a matter of genetic vulnerability. |
Borja_ | Exactly the same happens with operating systems. If we consider |
Borja_ | (hypotetically, of course) all operating systems equally |
Borja_ | secure -hence equally insecure-, it would be possible to |
Borja_ | develop an automated attack program, perhaps a worm, capable |
Borja_ | of affecting most of the system installations. What will |
Borja_ | happen if every users run *the same* operating system? Then |
Borja_ | the communications infrastructure will be in a high risk. |
Borja_ | A single worm could make the whole network collapse. |
Borja_ | The situation is even scarier; there is a trend towards uniformity, |
Borja_ | as newcomers to the network are using an intrinsecally insecure |
Borja_ | operating system: Windows. A critical mass of vulnerable |
Borja_ | systems is being created, and these vulnerable computers |
Borja_ | will be connected to the networks through broadband links. |
Borja_ | These computers will be connected 24/7, probably housing |
Borja_ | personal webservers, etc. |
Borja_ | A similar trend is being observed in the Unix world, although |
Borja_ | it is not so dangerous. Many people considering Unix systems |
Borja_ | for their servers are choosing Linux just because it is |
Borja_ | what they read in the media. This is an error. Obviously |
Borja_ | Unix systems are not intrinsecally insecure, although programming |
Borja_ | mistakes have been the cause of security problems in the |
Borja_ | past, and will also cause security problems in the future. |
Borja_ | Which future can we expect? Is Internet about to be shut |
Borja_ | down by vandals? Is there any hope? Well, I think there |
Borja_ | is a real risk here. Many people will connect to the network |
Borja_ | in the coming years. The newcomers will not be trained on |
Borja_ | computer security at all, and it seems that they will use |
Borja_ | Windows systems. |
Borja_ | The worms and viruses we have seen so far are not very sophisticated. |
Borja_ | Most of them are programs designed only to replicate, causing |
Borja_ | only collateral damage (significant, unfortunately). Nothing |
Borja_ | has been done to steal codes, credit-card numbers, etc. |
Borja_ | Worms have been extremely noisy. The propagation of the |
Borja_ | worms has caused denial of service problems in many networks, |
Borja_ | and the worms have been really noticed. However, the scenario |
Borja_ | of a silent worm propagating at a slow pace during months |
Borja_ | is not unlikely, and the results would be devastating. |
Borja_ | We can do something to prevent this. First of all, we must |
Borja_ | avoid uniformity. When planning a network design, always |
Borja_ | avoid adopting the same operating system for everything. |
Borja_ | Use a mix of them. No operating system is equal to the others; |
Borja_ | even Unix systems have noticeable differences among them. |
Borja_ | For each task, use the system best suited for it. |
Borja_ | Another problem is the current software monopoly situation; |
Borja_ | it must be fighted at all costs. It has almost killed innovation |
Borja_ | in the industry, as no company can try to introduce a new |
Borja_ | operating system. Microsoft has exclusive agreements with |
Borja_ | every PC computer manufacturers. the situation is serious |
Borja_ | indeed: people buying computers "withut |
Borja_ | an operating system" (this means without |
Borja_ | a Microsoft operating system, but this is one of the effects |
Borja_ | of monopolies) are treated as suspicious of software piracy. |
Borja_ | And the main battlefield here is education. We must make |
Borja_ | sure that students learn the fundamental principles. Nowadays, |
Borja_ | fashion dictates that computer science students must learn |
Borja_ | to use mainstream systems. Most of them are not proficient |
Borja_ | in proper data structures and algorithms design. Most of |
Borja_ | them don't know about operating systems design. Without |
Borja_ | foundation, it is impossible to have a good knowledge, and |
Borja_ | a professional with no solid knowledge is a bad professional. |
Borja_ | Bad professionals will only ensure that the present problems |
Borja_ | will be worse in the future. |
Borja_ | THE END |
fernand0 | plasplaspl plasplasplasplas |
Kefar | plas plas plas plas plas |
Dr_Q | clap clap clap clap |
Dr_Q | clap clap clap clap |
niyul | bravo!!!!! |
Dr_Q | very interesting indeep |
Kefar | plas plas plas plas plas |
Kefar | plas plas plas plas plas |
> clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap |
fernand0 | plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas |
> clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap |
> clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap |
> clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap |
> clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap |
> clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap |
Kefar | plas plas plas plas plas |
kiwnix | plas plas plas |
Kefar | plas plas plas plas plas |
> clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap |
> clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap |
dardhal | "Education is key" <<-- that is the important thing. Great. |
kiwnix | clap clap clap |
> a moment , Borja is traslating in #redes to spanish |
> and hi have a delay.... |
> a moment |
> very good Borja !!! |
> clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap |
> clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap |
> clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap |
> clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap |
limitations) |
fernand0 | plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas |
fernand0 | plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas |
fernand0 | plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas |
fernand0 | plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas plas |
Oroz | plas ... |
Oroz | :) |
fernand0 | eso pareció mas una bofetada |
> <sarnold> borja_ thank you; some thoughts .. when most |
programs designed to perform a function, ftpd, smtpd, etc, the clear majority |
fall prey to the same problems .. how can diversity truly help? |
Borja | Sorry... I was answering in #qc :-) |
> <Borja> Hi |
> <hensema_> Borja: what's your opinion on the recently |
released Evolution email-client, which is -- at least in appearance -- similar to |
Microsoft Outlook? |
> <sarnold> Borja_, furthermore, true completely seperate |
implementation diversity is *expensive* .. there are really only a few good mail |
clients out there .. implementing more is way too much work! |
Borja | Well, different implementations are not usually vulnerable to the |
same flaws, or, at least, to the same exploits. |
Borja | You shouldn't bet all your money to the same horse, I think... ;-) |
diva | chao a todos |
diva | que la pacen bien |
Borja | Next? |
Borja | regarding the appearance of Evolution, I don't think it is an |
issue. Outlook is a bad program from the security point of view. I don't use it, |
so I cannot comment on other issues ;-) |
Borja | I am using Kmail right now and I want to try Evolution. |
#linux |
Dr_Q | now |
Dr_Q | after this conference |
Dr_Q | i have clear |
#linux |
Dr_Q | what are the main causes about |
Dr_Q | the insecure at internet but... |
Borja | <leonardop> Borja... thanks for your interesting talk. Just for |
curiosity, what's your favorite BSD OS? and why? |
dardhal | Another "single point of failure" on today's Internet is DNS |
root servers, many of them using some version of BIND, which is scary |
Borja | Well, my favourite version of BSD is FreeBSD. I use PCs and it |
seems to be the best optimized for PCs. |
Dr_Q | isnt there other solucions but education to improve security? |
Borja | Yes, it is a single point of failure but if it is not excuted in the |
*same* operating system, at least it would be a daunting task to take over most |
DNS servers. If all of them were running exactly the same, we would be at a |
real risk. |
Borja | Education is critical in this case. This is related to a similar |
problem affecting society in general, the lack of scientific culture. |
sarnold | dr_q -- a massive help would be to switch to more type-safe |
languages ... |
dardhal | Borja: correct, but maybe you don't want more than taking the |
servers down, and halt the Interet as a whole :( |
Dr_Q | x |
Dr_Q | sarnold: thank you |
#linux |
Bacchus[brutus.conectiva.com.br]: EOF from client) |
Borja | People can be easily deceived by someone using some |
scientific words. Take, for example, homeopathy. many people think that it is |
legitimate. With some scientific culture you can see for yourself that its claims |
are absurd |
Borja | There are many risks now, sarnold. Someone may want to take |
the net down. Someone may want to compromise as many computers as |
possible to get valuable information. It has happened... |
Dr_Q | the only secure computer is the unplugged computer :-) |
Borja | Yes, but today an unplugged computer is just a pile of metal |
and sand. |
LarstiQ | van Eck phreaking et al, make that the demolished computer |
Borja | :-) |
#linux |
Borja | Next? |
JAZZANOVA | here it is spoken about the education, that is |
fundamental without a doubt, but what we do to spread it, to foment it? |
Borja | Well, university teachers must make sure that students learn |
computer science, not how to use a visual programming toolkit, a frequent |
mistake. |
STAR[shine.cmw.sld.cu]) |
g/ <-- php developer? hop on in ....) |
Borja | All of us can make a difference. I am sure many of you have |
friends who ask for help. |
Borja | You can educate them. |
JAZZANOVA | thanks |
Borja | And I don't think type-safe languages will alone fix the problem. |
Borja | I agree that C is not the best language for all the tasks for which |
it is used now. But it is great for systems programming. |
velco | especially when people just keep using old-fashined C ... |
from client) |
Borja | But buffer overflows are not the only kind of security flaws. |
There is a more dangerous kind, derived from interactions between programs. |
fernand0 | well there is an aforism i read somewhere |
fernand0 | choose any language |
fernand0 | and you can find a 'hacker' doing assembler in that |
language |
fernand0 | hehe |
Borja | I mean, of course wiping buffer overflows wouls make our lives |
easier, but it is not a silver bullet. |
Borja | Yes, it is true :-) |
Borja | And this kind of things bring us to my obsession... E D U C A T I |
O N |
Borja | Students are exposed to really bad influences. |
-- Accept no limitations) |
Borja | They are growing among poorly designed programs. |
fernand0 | discipline an order are not well considered features |
Borja | How many of you have used a non-Windows or non-Unix |
operating system? |
Borja | (And non-MSDOS, of course)? |
fernand0 | macos ? |
fernand0 | hehe |
fernand0 | pre-X, of course |
pdp | as400 |
JAZZANOVA | beos :) |
Borja | Sorry, I mea "non-mainstream" |
dardhal | Linux-only for some time :) |
Borja | :-) |
fernand0 | i supposed it, but wanted to joke |
Borja | VSTA? Amoeba? Plan 9? Inferno? |
Borja | Anyone? |
leonardop | non-Unix? I mean... there's a non-Unix OS out there? :-) |
Borja | ErOS? |
sarnold | (heh, don't say that loud enough for The Open Group to hear |
you.. :) |
sarnold | borja -- EROS! I've not yet booted it, but I've read all the docs |
:) |
pdp | os/360//390 for instance |
fernand0 | vms ? |
Borja | Yes, but I am thinking about systems with new ideas:-) |
fernand0 | it was mainstream hehe |
Borja | VMS... the previous work of the artist who perpetrated NT... |
fernand0 | well |
Borja | Vomit Making System, as Richard Stallman used to call it years |
ago |
fernand0 | i read somewhere that they are proud of it, at digital 0:) |
sarnold | yeah, but RMS removed the wheel check from 'su', so ... :) |
Eliz | saludos a todos! |
Borja | Well, VMS was stable. I just didn't like it |
kiwnix | HURD is a non-unix? |
fernand0 | well, mos unices are, aren't they? |
Borja | But Windows NT is a piece of crap. id any of you read the |
special issue of "IEEE Computer" covering Windows NT? |
Borja | It was similar to a PC magazine. Horrible |
fernand0 | business are business |
Dr_Q | i think windows is more secure than linux |
Borja | Really? |
viXard | Borja, what about theres an stadarized OS like happened with |
C language |
Dr_Q | juer, say that have caused me a stomach-ache |
sarnold | Dr_Q -- for kicks, sometime, head to securityfocus.com, look |
for the bugtraq archives, and look for the advisories from any single linux |
vendor, and any single microsoft vendor (heh heh) and do some counting... :) |
Dr_Q | Borja: no, i was joking again |
viXard | would this be a really problem ? |
Borja | :-) |
Dr_Q | i use debian for a long time ago, and from then i dont know |
what a antivirus is |
fernand0 | it is not secure, it is sure that IT professionals will get more |
money securign it :) |
viXard | Borja, what about theres an stadarized OS like happened with |
C language, would it be a disaster ? |
Borja | viXard, I don't think so. I mean, standardization affects APIs and |
command syntax, but there are many different CPUs out there. |
Eliz[169.158.164.136]) |
velco | sarnold: in fact, IIRC CERT has such lies, damned lies and |
statistics, which show similar number of vulnerabilities in Linux and Doze |
sarnold | velco, which just goes to show that, for some set of rules, |
windows isn't moer secure than linux :) |
velco | sure. |
Borja | But those vulnerabilities are different indeed. |
vulnerabilties wide open :) |
sorts of odd behaviors in Windows, like that stupid routine in IE that tries to |
determine the type of a file by its contents instead of using the MIME type. |
dardhal | sarnold: so we come to the point Borja talked about, |
education (both users' education and vendors' education) |
Borja | This sord of confusion is bad, it is serious. I don't see this in |
Unix. |
Borja | Of course there are minor programming mistakes, but most of |
them are fixed with at most a 100 line patch. |
Dr_Q | ive notice that my level of english have been getting lower and |
lower :-( |
> some data.... Borja: Message Labs estimate that que en 1999 la |
relacion virus / messaje mail ratio was 1/1400 during 1999. At 2000 year, this |
ratio was 1/700 and probably will be 1/300 en 2001. Also we have spam... |
indeed, do you think that the email have a good future? |
Borja | Which is the size of a Windows fix? I am not talking about the |
size of the service packs, but have a look at the very nature of the flaws. |
Borja | Do you think they are similar? |
viXard | Borja, what about those people that are technitians but don´t |
know anything about MIME type and networks structures. Are they helpless ? |
Borja | Well, email is the most important Internet service. It is funny, |
considering that its designers didn't think it would be used at all.. |
fernand0 | what about .Net ? |
fernand0 | how will go things there ? |
Borja | Well, the security of Passport has already been compromised ;-) |
pdp | it is also the most Mis-used service on the Internet |
fernand0 | hehe |
Borja | .Net is a real risk. |
Borja | Even the Gartner Group says it! |
fernand0 | some experts said that it was not so bad |
sarnold | pdp has a good point .. the fact that emails have 'attachments' |
demonstrates that distributed filesystems for the most part need work |
Borja | Fernand0, if you believe in diversity you don't belieeve in .Net |
or any similar iniciative. |
fernand0 | that's true |
viXard | What about privacy security, is there a way to keep my privacy |
from the owner of the service ? |
lack of attention to security... would you trust it? |
Borja | Yes, viXard, strong cryptography, fortunately available for all of |
us. |
Borja | Have a look at the Phil Zimmerman's pages in MIT. |
viXard | what abut LSSI ? |
Borja | PGP has saved lives of people under dictatorships |
Borja | Well, I think the golverment knows nothing about Internet. They |
have to learn... |
Borja | LSSI has some good points, but unfortunately it has very |
danbgerous points. |
Borja | Anyway it won't pass. It is against the constitution. |
viXard | Spanish Constitution |
Borja | Yes, I forgot it :-) |
viXard | what about the rest of europe and the world ? |
Borja | (I'm Spanish) |
for being a country with great civil freedom, despite their claims. |
dardhal | Borja: Spanish LSSI prerelease3 does have major changes |
with respect to the original version. |
viXard | US have released new laws that permits authorities to look |
under our dresses ;) |
Borja | I know, but have not read the 0.33 version. |
#linux |
viXard | solo 5 mins |
dardhal | Borja: it is far from perfect, but is a major advance with repect |
to the original one |
viXard | If Kriptopolis moved their servers to US away from LSSI, then |
they must be back running away fron new US laws XD |
viXard | Is an endless running |
dardhal | viXard: jeje, what kriptopolis did is something still not |
explained |
viXard | jej |
viXard | they are going to end on south pole |
dardhal | viXard: a good place to overclock Athlons :) |
viXard | or inside a submarine called Nautilus |
viXard | yeah ! |
viXard | they can make a conection to chile XD |
Borja | Mars? :-) |
Borja | Or perhaps with a wireless link to a backpack! |
Borja | :-) |
viXard | jeje |
sarnold | borja -- one still needs to find an uplink, which can be tough.. |
viXard | yeah, The moon is american |
dardhal | viXard: the submarine could be attacked by a huge and |
horrid slow-moving species called Mozilla XDD |
viXard | damn right |
Borja | Anyway, I don't think it will be so hard. |
SKARLET[169.158.164.157]) |
viXard | what about self-implanted worms? |
pdp | just eat a Burger.... |
viXard | administrators that are unconfortable with their companies and |
write their own worms |
sarnold | heh, protecting against upset administrators can be pretty |
tough :) |
Borja | It is just the same old problem with internal security. |
Borja | Almost impossible, depending on the resources available ;-) |
Oroz | keep the administrator comfortable... |
viXard | je |
viXard | no way to do it XD |
CTCP TROUT THIS, BITCH!) |
sarnold | sure .. have the OS and applications require N identical |
actions from N different administrators before any changes can be made |
Borja | Anyone with responsibility can cause a lot of damage. What |
about excutives? |
Borja | Yes, but it is expensive. You need complex systems to do that. |
Borja | That's why I say "depending on available resources" :-) |
sarnold | ayup :) |
sarnold | it was important enough that nuclear command and control |
systems were designed that way .. |
dardhal | Borja: "common sense" seems to be a scarce resource, |
specially at many Spanish companies :( |
sarnold | but you will note that WinNT/XP was *not* designed that way, |
and .. to the best of my knowledge, no Unix systems either :) |
sarnold | dardhal: s/Spanish// |
dardhal | sarnold: but here the situation seems even worse, we are |
some years behind in everything |
Borja | No, but Unix has a simpler dsign, and it is a plus. |
dardhal | sarnold: including "common sense" |
Borja | I don't think so, dardhal |
Borja | True, there are fewer Internet users than in USA. And so? |
dardhal | Borja: not talking about users, but about "corporate |
computing" |
Borja | Problems are similar in USA and in Spain in corporations |
Dr_Q | dardhal its worse in other country like Cuba, where access to |
internet is censured |
dardhal | Dr_Q: sure, but we are talking about places were "freedom" |
is not a primary concern, because you "have it" |
Dr_Q | i agree |
Borja | Anyway, we should not get it for granted. Now and then |
someone will try to limit our freedom. |
Borja | Look at what is happening now. |
viXard | yeah |
viXard | kill the bastards XD |
sarnold | heh, you don't have to put up with .us's ashcroft :) |
Borja | We have our own ashcrofts here... |
sarnold | oh; I'm sorry to hear that :( |
dardhal | Borja: but many people think lack of freedom is when you are |
put into jail, not before. There is no "critical mass" of people concerned about, |
for example, what is going on in the USA |
sarnold | I figured the EU countries were generally more sane... |
Dr_Q | well, good night to everybody |
Borja | dardhal, I think many people here are concerned indeed |
dardhal | sarnold: Europe is like The Matrix, nobady can tell what it is :( |
Dr_Q | i promise to pratice my english to improve it :-) |
Borja | Yes, sarnold, but there are crazy politicians all over the world |
viXard | darhal: jeje |
dardhal | Borja: one think is to be concerned about facts, and the other |
about what some political parties and social groups want you to believe |
Borja | Well, what is your opinion on my Bad English? ;-) |
dardhal | Borja: not bas, excelent english |
dardhal | s/bas/bad/ |
viXard | how many people in here don´t speal spanish ? |
Dr_Q | your english is very bueno |
Dr_Q | :-) |
Borja | Of course, we are lucky. This conversation is actually taking |
place! |
viXard | my vocabulary is going down XD |
Dr_Q | and mine |
Borja | :-) |
sarnold | viXard -- 'hola', 'como te lama', 'bueno', are about all my |
spanish :) |
Dr_Q | some time ago, i used to practice english every day |
viXard | i don´t know how to say "glutamato de potasio " |
Dr_Q | sarnold: using that words you can build a lot of phrases |
dardhal | Dr_Q: I'm sure you read much more english pages a day |
than in spanish |
sarnold | donde esta el banos .. :) |
Dr_Q | dardhal: yes |
sarnold | (I can't find the n~ key on my keyboard :) |
Dr_Q | but its different understands what you read that try to write in |
english what a have in my mind |
Oroz | sarnold: una cerveza por favor? |
sarnold | groz, jejej :) |
Dr_Q | bye |
Dr_Q | ;-) |
Oroz | usually everbody knows the meaning of that |
viXard | going back to tiranosaurious species...... |
sarnold | 'night Dr_Q |
viXard | what about that meeting about cybercrimen just few days ago ? |
viXard | what´s was the real declaration of that ? |
Borja | Well, I think cybercrime must be fught |
Borja | (fought) |
dardhal | viXard: it was signed, approved by some countries, and |
about to generate country-wide laws to enforce it |
Borja | I mean, we need freedom. But nobody needs freedom to |
damage others. |
viXard | but they "way " they apply those laws, is what matters me |
viXard | i´m more paranoic about authorities than about crackers |
Borja | I am paranoid about both |
viXard | or a damn stupid script kiddie |
dardhal | viXard: this treaty about cybercrime says little about |
punishment, but talks a great deal about "ISP collaborating with authorities to |
gather data an evidences" |
Borja | But crackers, even the lamest of the script kiddies, are limiting |
our trust on communication networks. |
Oroz | 'nigh * |
But then again, who does?) |
viXard | I was readind few weeks ago, "the hacker crackdown", and |
there was a lot of abuses against people |
Borja | I agree with you, and we need well-thought laws. |
Borja | But, as there is a law that protects you from being stolen, raped |
or killed, there should be one protecting your email |
viXard | FBI and USSS were a real pain in the ass, for every BBS owner |
Borja | I know. It was very bad done, indeed. They knew nothing |
(Aplicación Saliendo) |
viXard | but they don´t acuse you for rober at least they have proves |
JAZZANOVA | anyone knows about "Linterna Mágica" ? i dont know |
the real name... |
viXard | instead of cybercrime, they asume that as you know computer |
stuff, you´re dangerous |
Borja | It is a cultural problem. They must learn. |
sarnold | 'Magic Lantern' |
Borja | If I say I am a supporter of nuclear energy, how many of you will |
see an alarm flashing? |
sarnold | borja, I've got mixed feelings, for sure .. |
dardhal | Borja: nuclear energy is good, is taken seriously |
Borja | There are lots of irrational feelings about many subjects. This is |
happening with cybercrime among judges, politicians and lawyers, and the |
society in general. |
#linux |
viXard | peoples rights are are subvaluated |
dardhal | viXard: people are not aware of their rights, and so they don't |
fight for them |
viXard | my mailbox was digged out whithout my knowlegde, and |
without no authority permission |
viXard | just because a suspicious |
viXard | where did I should go? |
viXard | nowhere! nobody´s deffending my rights against that |
Borja | That should be punished, of course. |
sarnold | viXard -- run your own ISP :) |
Borja | Anyway, no court would accept it as a proof |
viXard | laws don´t consider this as a right |
viXard | sarnold, that was at my last job |
viXard | people |
viXard | http://www.walc2002.pucmm.edu.do/ |
viXard | El V taller en teconologias de redes e internet para america |
latina y el caribe |
krUNIX | viZard? |
viXard | May 2002 |
viXard | KrUNIX ? |
krUNIX | linuxlatino? |
viXard | sep |
krUNIX | cool |
krUNIX | viniste a la conferencia? |
dardhal | It's been a great pleasure to talk with all of you |
viXard | PARTICIPANTES EXTRANJEROS |
viXard | 1.- US$1,300.00 PARA LOS QUE SE INSCRIBAN ANTES DEL 15 DE FEBRERO 2002. |
viXard | Incluye participación en el taller seleccionado, alojamiento, desayunos, almuerzos, Refrigerios, Transporte desde el hotel al lugar del evento, Seguro de Hospitalización y Cirugia en caso de accidentes. |
viXard | 2.- US$1,400.00 PARA LOS QUE SE INSCRIBAN DESPUES DEL 15 DE FEBRERO 2002. |
viXard | Incluye participacion en el taller seleccionado, Alojamiento, Desayunos, Almuerzos, Refrigerios, Transporte desde el hotel al lugar del evento, Seguro de Hospitalización y Cirugia en caso de Accidentes. |
dardhal | Godd morning/evening/night || Buenos días/tardes/noches |
viXard | same, darhal XD |
sarnold | dardhal :) |
viXard | krUNIX: sip, estaba charlando un poco con el conferencistas y otras personas |
krUNIX | aja |
krUNIX | pero ya termino la confrencia? |
viXard | sep |
krUNIX | :( |
krUNIX | llegue tarde |
krUNIX | los logs los publicaran? |
viXard | http://umeet.uninet.edu/umeet2001/spanish/prog.html |
Borja | Estarán en el web mañana, supongo |
viXard | http://umeet.uninet.edu/umeet2001/spanish/des.html <-- los logs |
krUNIX | cool |
krUNIX | ;) |
krUNIX | grax |
krUNIX | aja |
viXard | me cambio de conexion |
wings) |
krUNIX | entonces mañana es ataques de DoS |
End of #linux buffer Fri Dec 07 00:06:46 2001 |