aktin0s | hi |
---|---|
amd | how long do the software patents last? |
slef | 21 years minimum by treaty IIRC |
slef | like all patents |
S3v3N | Question: Why UNIX is more expensiva than Linux if the´re the |
same ? | |
slef | Why did the intro say "Open Source"? Isn't the "Open Source" |
movement about copyright only? | |
slef | UK Patent Office likes patents because it has to generate |
revenue to cover its costs. I hear this is a problem in New Mexico and some | |
other US states. What is the situation in other places? | |
S3v3N | in the name are in the sevenehaus |
trulux | nas |
S3v3N | and you be there, and you striking my hai |
dElEtE | Pregunta: ¿No piensan que lo de EOLAS es algo positivo, ya |
que han enseñado a la sociedad lo ridiculo de las patentes de software? | |
slef | S3v3N: gimme some of those pills. |
casteller | hmmm, creo que en parte si que es positivo ya que ha hecho |
ponerse las pilas al W3C para pedir al gobierno USA que delimite mejor el | |
tema de la pantetabilidad | |
> please, any could send the questionof delete in English ? | |
bug | yes |
bug | I will |
fernand0 | delete is asking about the positive aspects of EOLAS |
showing to the people the stupid part of patents | |
guugmembe | no les molesta a ud los mensajes de gente que entra y sale? |
guugmembe | como quito eso? |
S3v3N | slef yes, i have got here a lot, come here! ( carry money ) |
dElEtE | sorry :-) |
kruger_ | si a mi si me molestan esos mensajes |
kruger_ | si se pueden quitar seria excelente |
> se pueden... es un comando de cada cliente de irc | |
guugmembe | kruger_: no se si los quita uno de su cliente o es el canal |
guugmembe | MJesus: en xchat cual es? |
Mondongo | en bitchx es /ignore #canal all -public |
horacio | click derecho sobre la pestaña del canal-> "Show join/part |
messages" en xchat | |
guugmembe | horacio: excelente |
slef | kial estas nur iberia? |
amd | so if i just "rewrite" the copyrighted source code (change the |
variable names and stuff like this..) the license doesn't apply anymore? | |
slef | the patent licence would |
amd | ok.. |
j_heald | amd: you would have to do a lot heavier rewriting than that, |
just to beat (C) | |
slef | but copyright licence wouldn't |
slef | depends on scale of change, aye |
billar | hi |
j_heald | there's quite a complex law test -- but basically they look |
at all the things in the source code that don't affect its overall function | |
-- if those show you "derived" your code from somebody's (C) material, they | |
can have you | |
bug | slef: -> #linux |
bug | james too :-) |
bug | I voice you slef |
amd | how much does it cost to get something patented? |
bug | 50 kE |
> more slowsly please, the spanish traslator with some delay | |
bug | for a communautary patent |
j_heald | can be about Euro 30,000 |
Mondongo | so, basically, it's a cabal between the guild of patents |
and the great software lords with tons of money? how can we oppose that? | |
amd | so this means that big companies with lots of $$$ have already |
won, if the software patents are allowed... | |
laurix | si la patente de un programa no se renueva a que tipo de |
licencia se acoge el programa? | |
jaw2 | if the program's patent expire, which is the program's license? |
j_heald | the program goes on being protected by copyright for |
lifetime+70 years | |
j_heald | the end of the patent means that after 20 years *you* are |
finally allowed to write your own program | |
Mondongo | Amazon has been patenting silly stuff for years. Why only |
now are we trying to do something? Is this a Europe vs. USA thing? :) | |
Voins | j_heald, lifetime of author or lifetime of copyright holder? |
what will be "lifetime" for programs copyrighted by MS? | |
j_heald | voins: author of the program |
shadowtl2 | 100 not lifetime |
j_heald | "make sure there's somebody young on the team" as one law |
book says | |
j_heald | life + 70 is EU standard |
shadowtl2 | life +70 years or 100 years for a company |
j_heald | mondongo: why only now |
j_heald | answer: because this is when the EU commission proposed this |
new directive | |
j_heald | only the commission is allowed to start a new EU law, so |
they control the timetable | |
j_heald | the UK has wanted a directive to allow swpat for over 10 |
years | |
j_heald | but in March 2002, the process finally began |
Mondongo | j_heald: so, it IS a Europe vs. USA thing! :-) (I'm from |
Argentina) | |
j_heald | well kind of -- there is a deeper issue |
j_heald | USA + EU got the TRIPS treaty agreed by the World Trade |
Organisation | |
j_heald | mostly to stop countries writing their own laws on IP |
j_heald | & to stop special exceptions for national companies |
amd | IP = intellectual property? |
j_heald | yes |
j_heald | TRIPS says "inventions in all technological fields must be |
patentable" | |
shadowtl2 | Question:Will the swpat be a plied retrospectively, so |
that no M$ computers that use FAT will be effected, say? | |
j_heald | this was written in by the USA + the EU basically to force |
countries to allow drug patents | |
off) | |
j_heald | but now the USA says it means s/w must be patentable |
j_heald | The EU is scared the USA would start a trade war |
j_heald | but -interestingly- most of the member states are a lot less |
scared | |
Mondongo | and who's benefitting from this? (as my history teacher |
would say, whenever you don't understand, look out for the profit) | |
j_heald | But yes: the USA is pushing for it |
j_heald | 50% of european software patents held by US companies |
j_heald | question answered ? :-) |
Mondongo | j_heald: quite! ;-) |
Mondongo | thanks |
j_heald | it's good for *big* software companies, they can stop small |
companies competing | |
j_heald | stop linux |
j_heald | stop competition |
j_heald | keep their prices up |
Mondongo | patent everything, so no one can write a thing without |
infringing | |
j_heald | shadowtl2: MS already has 2 EU patents for FAT |
j_heald | -- although FSF think they could be challenged |
Mondongo | what can us south americans do? brace ourselves? |
Mondongo | (can "we" south americans ... my grammar, oy) |
#qc | |
shadowtl2 | How can you already get swpat and does that make my |
computer illegal | |
(Ping timeout) | |
james_h | okay: the history here |
james_h | 1973 European Patent Convention |
james_h | says no patents on computer programs "as such" |
james_h | 1977 Original guidelines for EPO patent examiners |
james_h | very fierce against software patents |
james_h | 1985 "Vicom" decision |
james_h | computer program that does image processing is not a |
computer program "as such" | |
james_h | -- according to the EPO board of appeal |
james_h | 1986 new EPO guidelines |
james_h | since then some member states agreed quickly to change |
james_h | others didn't |
james_h | others, it never came to court |
james_h | so EPO granted the patents, but not clear which countries |
will uphold them | |
james_h | change never discussed by politicians |
james_h | ... until now |
james_h | so 30,000 of these patents exist |
james_h | this directive will either say: |
shadowtl2 | BCS said only swpat exists (quote from mid 1990s) |
shadowtl2 | BCS said only one swpat exists (quote from mid 1990s) |
james_h | the patents are okay, and you can have them on a much wider |
range of software | |
james_h | or the patents are not okay |
james_h | shadow: this is a big point |
Mondongo | so, it's all or nothing ... |
timeout) | |
james_h | mon: more or less -- it's difficult to draw a differnt line |
that could work | |
james_h | shadow: uk govt says patents for 20 years -- what's the |
problem ? | |
james_h | But most patents very recent |
james_h | & people only now starting to think about litigating them |
shadowtl2 | But FAT is over 21 years old |
Voins | shadowtl2, there's much younger variants of FAT |
james_h | the patents are on the long name -> short name conversion, |
circa 1996 | |
shadowtl2 | Please can you tell me which versions are patented? |
#qc | |
james_h | vfat |
james_h | in particular the use of a btree to look up the filename |
conversions | |
#qc (Leaving) | |
shadowtl2 | Is there key for the swpat EP votes list |
james_h | did you try the google box ? |
james_h | it's the only way I can ever find anything on the site ? |
james_h | http://swpat.ffii.org/papers/eubsa-swpat0202/plen0309/vote/an |
alysis.html | |
james_h | oh sorry, you mean what each vote was about ? |
shadowtl2 | What does the colour mean forinstance |
bug | green should be allied :-) |
unimauro | Hi |
unimauro | this channel is in spanish or english |
james_h | en |
unimauro | ... |
unimauro | Who do you know about software patents and ALCA? |
james_h | shadow: Frahm is a Nordic Green Left MEP who voted pretty |
much our way; votes with Frahm are in Green, votes the other way are in red | |
james_h | what is acla ? |
unimauro | ALCA = en español Tratado de Libre Comercio para las |
Americas | |
james_h | FTAA in English I think -- Free Trade Area of the Americas ? |
unimauro | james_h, yeah |
unimauro | NAFTA |
(Leaving) | |
james_h | The USA has been pushing for a lot more Intellectual |
Property protection -- but I think the talks last month mostly went against | |
them ? | |
james_h | I don;t know whether swpat was specifically raised -- maybe |
someone can say? | |
unimauro | well in my country the software developers is down :( |
unimauro | Nothing think about the future problem in this trade :/ |
http://www.undernet.org/webchat.php) | |
timeout) | |
off) | |
Windows: Reboot!) | |
off) | |
GuERo | Hola |
(Aplicación Saliendo) | |
Leaving) | |
End of #qc buffer Mon Dec 15 22:04:22 2003 |